SEOUL, South Korea – North Korea threatened Wednesday to wipe the United States off the map as Washington and its allies watched for signs the regime will launch a series of missiles in the coming days.
Off China's coast, a U.S. destroyer was tailing a North Korean ship suspected of transporting illicit weapons to Myanmar in what could be the first test of U.N. sanctions passed to punish the nation for an underground nuclear test last month.
The Kang Nam left the North Korean port of Nampo a week ago with the USS John S. McCain close behind. The ship, accused of transporting banned goods in the past, is believed bound for Myanmar, according to South Korean and U.S. officials.
The new U.N. Security Council resolution requires member states to seek permission to inspect suspicious cargo. North Korea has said it would consider interception a declaration of war and on Wednesday accused the U.S. of seeking to provoke another Korean War.
"If the U.S. imperialists start another war, the army and people of Korea will ... wipe out the aggressors on the globe once and for all," the official Korean Central News Agency said.
The warning came on the eve of the 59th anniversary of the start of the three-year Korean War, which ended in a truce in 1953, not a peace treaty, leaving the peninsula in state of war.
The U.S. has 28,500 troops in South Korea to protect against an outbreak of hostilities.
so if the world is anticipating a missile strike then they must believe that the US is willing to engage in an act of war against North Korea. It makes sense to think this considering we were committing acts of war against the Japanese through sanctions and blockade which then provoked the attack on Pearl Harbor.
I'd actually like to know what is between the ellipses in that quote. I would imagine that it is something like Ahmadinajad would say where it is cut up with words left out to make him look like psychopathic murderer.
"If the U.S. imperialists start another war, the army and people of Korea will ...[what words are missing here...] wipe out the aggressors on the globe once and for all," a dispatch from the official Korean Central News Agency said.
I believe it is something along the lines of "If the U.S. imperialists start another war, the army and people of Korea will [be compelled to stop then open acts of war and aggression against our country perpetrated by the United States through the imperial decree of sanctions and the interdiction of our sovereign right to sell our products to the world and will be forced to] wipe out the aggressors on the globe once and for all,"
"North Korea...warned...it would fire a long-range...nuclear...missile...,a SCUD missile with a range of up to 310 miles (500 kilometers) or a short-range ground-to-ship missile with a range of 100 miles...they also...will expedite the introduction of high-tech unmanned aerial surveillance systems and "bunker-buster" bombs...after meeting with...U.S. Defense Undersecretary Michele Flournoy"
By HYUNG-JIN KIM, Associated Press Writer Hyung-jin Kim, Associated Press Writer – Mon Jun 22, 7:05 pm ET
SEOUL, South Korea – A North Korean-flagged ship under close watch in Asian waters is believed to be heading toward Myanmar carrying small arms cargo banned under a new U.N. resolution, a South Korean intelligence official said Monday.
Still, analysts say a high seas interception — something North Korea has said it would consider an act of war — is unlikely.
The Kang Nam, accused of engaging in illicit trade in the past, is the first vessel monitored under the new sanctions designed to punish the North for its defiant nuclear test last month. The U.S. military began tracking the ship after it left a North Korean port on Wednesday on suspicion it was carrying illicit weapons.
A South Korean intelligence official said Monday that his agency believes the North Korean ship is carrying small weapons and is sailing toward the Myanmar city of Yangon.
The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity citing the sensitive nature of the information, said he could provide no further details.
Myanmar's military government, which faces an arms embargo from the U.S. and the European Union, reportedly has bought weapons from North Korea in the past.
The Irrawaddy, an online magazine operated by independent exiled journalists from Myanmar, reported Monday that the North Korean ship would dock at the Thilawa port, some 20 miles (30 kilometers) south of Yangon, in the next few days.
The magazine cited an unidentified port official as saying that North Korean ships have docked there in the past. The magazine's in-depth coverage of Myanmar has been generally reliable in the past.
South Korean television network YTN reported Sunday that the ship was streaming toward Myanmar but said the vessel appeared to be carrying missiles and related parts. The report cited an unidentified intelligence source in South Korea.
Kim Jin-moo, an analyst at Seoul's state-run Korea Institute for Defense Analyses, said the North is believed to have sold guns, artillery and other small weapons to Myanmar but not missiles, which it has been accused of exporting to Iran and Syria.
The U.N. sanctions, which toughen an earlier arms embargo against North Korea, ban the country from exporting all weapons and weapons-related material, meaning any weapons shipment to Myanmar would violate the resolution.
The Security Council resolution calls on all 192 U.N. member states to inspect North Korean vessels on the high seas "if they have information that provides reasonable grounds to believe that the cargo" contains banned weapons or material to make them. But that requires approval from the North.
If the North refuses to give approval, it must direct the vessel "to an appropriate and convenient port for the required inspection by the local authorities."
North Korea, however, is unlikely to allow any inspection of its cargo, making an interception unlikely, said Hong Hyun-ik, an analyst at the Sejong Institute think tank outside Seoul.
A senior U.S. military official told The Associated Press on Friday that a Navy ship, the USS John S. McCain, is relatively close to the North Korean vessel but had no orders to intercept it. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the issue.
Any chance for an armed skirmish between the two ships is low, analysts say, though the North Korean crew is possibly armed with rifles.
"It's still a cargo ship. A cargo ship can't confront a warship," said Baek Seung-joo of the Korea Institute for Defense Analyses.
Tension on the Korean peninsula has been running high since the North's May 25 nuclear test, with Pyongyang and Washington exchanging near-daily accusations against each other.
President Barack Obama assured Americans in an interview broadcast Monday that the U.S. is prepared for any move North Korea might make amid media reports that Pyongyang is planning a long-range missile test in early July.
"This administration — and our military — is fully prepared for any contingencies," Obama said during an interview with CBS News' "The Early Show."
Still, ever defiant, North Korea declared itself a "proud nuclear power" and warned Monday that it would strike if provoked.
"As long as our country has become a proud nuclear power, the U.S. should take a correct look at whom it is dealing with," the country's main Rodong Sinmun said in commentary. "It would be a grave mistake for the U.S. to think it can remain unhurt if it ignites the fuse of war on the Korean peninsula."
The US military has abruptly ended an informal arrangement that allowed scientists access to data on incoming meteors from classified surveillance satellites.
...
Weeden speculates that the Pentagon may not want details of the new satellites' capabilities to be made public, or it may simply lack the expensive software needed to handle classified and declassified data simultaneously. "The decision may have been made that it was perhaps too difficult to disclose just these data," he says.
Another thought I had... without this data, there would be fewer people able to contradict claims of a missile strike from North Korea. Or I may just be getting a little too conspiratorial.
Hmmmmm, that is very very ominous and fits completely in with what I think would be the best delivery method of a false flag against the West coast.
Too conspiratorial? Never, there is nothing wrong with stretching the imagination because you never know when you will stumble into something very big.
The U.S. military is planning to intercept a flagged North Korean ship suspected of proliferating weapons material in violation of a U.N. Security Council resolution passed last Friday, FOX News has learned.
The USS John McCain, a navy destroyer, will intercept the ship Kang Nam as soon as it leaves the vicinity off the coast of China, according to a senior U.S. defense official. The order to interdict has not been given yet, but the ship is getting into position.
and the question remains for now...does North Korea who has a maniacal leader who is dying and wants to secure his place in history and also provide some backbone to his burgeoning progeny who will assume the throne make good on it;s promise to set off a nuke if the ship is interdicted.
How interesting is it that the destroyer is named the USS John McCain...man when I first read that I thought it was a freaking joke.
nuking Hawaii would be one of the more sensible(lol?) choices for a false flag. Yes you would lose a valuable tourist and historical place but it's so far from the mainland that fallout risk would be negligible and with the open spot for a state available we could officially bring Israel in as the new 50th state. It would also be very valuable to use as the new new Pearl Harbor. The "left wing" version of 9/11 and the PNAC report.
Like I said below, how hard would it be to sneak the SSBN SuperArmageddonDoomsday666 into position off the coast of the DPRK and fire off a trident to make it look like a rogue launch. Yeah China and Russia would figure it out pretty quickly, but by that time we would already be committed to an open nuclear war.
A couple months ago Mike Rivero the owner of whatreallyhappened who lives in Hawaii, was running stories about how Hawaii had it's sovereignty stolen from them and that there was a growing movement to reclaim their right to exist as a seperate entity. Not really secession because in their minds they aren't a real state. They fit perfectly into the DHS vision for what a modern domestic terrorist organization looks like. Rivero was also running story after story about how the Navy was shooting up the outlying areas of the islands with DU. So a nuke blast in Hawaii would also have the side effect of silencing one of the largest alternative news aggregate sites on the internet.
Not buying it since the North Koreans have, like so many other countries threatened by the U.S., said that they will retaliate against U.S. aggression. This of course is always taken as OMG THIS COUNTRY WANTS TO WIPE US ALL OFF THE MAP THESE SONS OF BITCHES MUST DIE. The best example being the Ahmadinejad always being misquoted when speaking about retaliation against a U.S. attack or when he says that Zionism needs to be wiped off the face of the Earth.
Anyway it doesn't freaking matter because the missile has notoriously bad guidance and has a max range 500 miles short of the supposed target.
Well you know if we want this bad enough the navy could just position a sub off the coast of NK and fire off a trident in the direction of Hawaii and nobody would ever know the difference. Well except for the Chinese and Russians who have sophisticated satellites that are built to locate and track missile launches but that should be no trouble for our media to spin.
The thing I find strange about North Korea is that there is hardly any news at all in the international websites. Check out the front pages of China's two biggest sites:
China denies reports of Beijing visit by Kim Jong Il's son
A Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman on Thursday denied reports that the son of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) top leader Kim Jong Il had visited Beijing.
...
The UN Security Council on Friday unanimously approved Resolution 1874, which allowed wider sanctions against the DPRK for its May 25 nuclear test. The DPRK has voiced strong opposition to that move.
It just seems strange to me that China, their next door neighbor, doesn't have much in their news on the subject. I did a search for more North Korean articles, and all of the negative statements and press are coming from American sources.
It is so hard when the air is filled with so many lies and distortions -- who do you trust? Our government seems to be raising a big stink about North Korea (with the collusion of our media), but is there really a threat at all? Just as there was no threat from Iraq despite "everyone" saying so in 2002, I wonder if they are fabricating an enemy once again.
I seriously doubt that the DPRK is able to sustain the nuclear arsenal that is mentioned in the article. My fear is that instead of confronting Kim Jong Il with overwhelming force (see the Tree War), the Obama administration is going to pussyfoot around and get us involved in a real war.
I also think that those two "Japanese" that were detained in Italy with those bonds are North Korean intelligence and the bonds are forgeries.
Good god. I misspelled Steven and now I can't edit it. Kat would love that.
***
Something definitely weird about the bond thing. We'll never be told the truth though. It's good that they've changed the selective service rules now so everyone can be drafted. My grandma's been itching to kick some commie ass.
I love our foreign policy.
Make wild accusations and threats, then when the world turns to look and says wtf...just pretend like it was all a joke or a misunderstanding.
Official: US Won’t Forcibly Board North Korean Ship
http://news.antiwar.com/2009/06/26/official-us-wont-forcibly-board-north...
N. Korea threatens US; world anticipates missile
SEOUL, South Korea – North Korea threatened Wednesday to wipe the United States off the map as Washington and its allies watched for signs the regime will launch a series of missiles in the coming days.
Off China's coast, a U.S. destroyer was tailing a North Korean ship suspected of transporting illicit weapons to Myanmar in what could be the first test of U.N. sanctions passed to punish the nation for an underground nuclear test last month.
The Kang Nam left the North Korean port of Nampo a week ago with the USS John S. McCain close behind. The ship, accused of transporting banned goods in the past, is believed bound for Myanmar, according to South Korean and U.S. officials.
The new U.N. Security Council resolution requires member states to seek permission to inspect suspicious cargo. North Korea has said it would consider interception a declaration of war and on Wednesday accused the U.S. of seeking to provoke another Korean War.
"If the U.S. imperialists start another war, the army and people of Korea will ... wipe out the aggressors on the globe once and for all," the official Korean Central News Agency said.
The warning came on the eve of the 59th anniversary of the start of the three-year Korean War, which ended in a truce in 1953, not a peace treaty, leaving the peninsula in state of war.
The U.S. has 28,500 troops in South Korea to protect against an outbreak of hostilities.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/as_koreas_nuclear
so if the world is anticipating a missile strike then they must believe that the US is willing to engage in an act of war against North Korea. It makes sense to think this considering we were committing acts of war against the Japanese through sanctions and blockade which then provoked the attack on Pearl Harbor.
look closer...
what does north korea know that we don't know?
"If the U.S. imperialists start another war, ...
that's pretty broad... don't you think?
I'd actually like to know what is between the ellipses in that quote. I would imagine that it is something like Ahmadinajad would say where it is cut up with words left out to make him look like psychopathic murderer.
"If the U.S. imperialists start another war, the army and people of Korea will ...[what words are missing here...] wipe out the aggressors on the globe once and for all," a dispatch from the official Korean Central News Agency said.
I believe it is something along the lines of "If the U.S. imperialists start another war, the army and people of Korea will [be compelled to stop then open acts of war and aggression against our country perpetrated by the United States through the imperial decree of sanctions and the interdiction of our sovereign right to sell our products to the world and will be forced to] wipe out the aggressors on the globe once and for all,"
excellent point.
.
Good point. That is the problem with most quotes in the press -- how much did they distort and misrepresent the original statement?
Fun with ellipses. "North
Fun with ellipses.
"North Korea...warned...it would fire a long-range...nuclear...missile...,a SCUD missile with a range of up to 310 miles (500 kilometers) or a short-range ground-to-ship missile with a range of 100 miles...they also...will expedite the introduction of high-tech unmanned aerial surveillance systems and "bunker-buster" bombs...after meeting with...U.S. Defense Undersecretary Michele Flournoy"
LOL. Yep, that's pretty much it.
Official: N. Korean ship carries weapons to Myanmar
By HYUNG-JIN KIM, Associated Press Writer Hyung-jin Kim, Associated Press Writer – Mon Jun 22, 7:05 pm ET
SEOUL, South Korea – A North Korean-flagged ship under close watch in Asian waters is believed to be heading toward Myanmar carrying small arms cargo banned under a new U.N. resolution, a South Korean intelligence official said Monday.
Still, analysts say a high seas interception — something North Korea has said it would consider an act of war — is unlikely.
The Kang Nam, accused of engaging in illicit trade in the past, is the first vessel monitored under the new sanctions designed to punish the North for its defiant nuclear test last month. The U.S. military began tracking the ship after it left a North Korean port on Wednesday on suspicion it was carrying illicit weapons.
A South Korean intelligence official said Monday that his agency believes the North Korean ship is carrying small weapons and is sailing toward the Myanmar city of Yangon.
The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity citing the sensitive nature of the information, said he could provide no further details.
Myanmar's military government, which faces an arms embargo from the U.S. and the European Union, reportedly has bought weapons from North Korea in the past.
The Irrawaddy, an online magazine operated by independent exiled journalists from Myanmar, reported Monday that the North Korean ship would dock at the Thilawa port, some 20 miles (30 kilometers) south of Yangon, in the next few days.
The magazine cited an unidentified port official as saying that North Korean ships have docked there in the past. The magazine's in-depth coverage of Myanmar has been generally reliable in the past.
South Korean television network YTN reported Sunday that the ship was streaming toward Myanmar but said the vessel appeared to be carrying missiles and related parts. The report cited an unidentified intelligence source in South Korea.
Kim Jin-moo, an analyst at Seoul's state-run Korea Institute for Defense Analyses, said the North is believed to have sold guns, artillery and other small weapons to Myanmar but not missiles, which it has been accused of exporting to Iran and Syria.
The U.N. sanctions, which toughen an earlier arms embargo against North Korea, ban the country from exporting all weapons and weapons-related material, meaning any weapons shipment to Myanmar would violate the resolution.
The Security Council resolution calls on all 192 U.N. member states to inspect North Korean vessels on the high seas "if they have information that provides reasonable grounds to believe that the cargo" contains banned weapons or material to make them. But that requires approval from the North.
If the North refuses to give approval, it must direct the vessel "to an appropriate and convenient port for the required inspection by the local authorities."
North Korea, however, is unlikely to allow any inspection of its cargo, making an interception unlikely, said Hong Hyun-ik, an analyst at the Sejong Institute think tank outside Seoul.
A senior U.S. military official told The Associated Press on Friday that a Navy ship, the USS John S. McCain, is relatively close to the North Korean vessel but had no orders to intercept it. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the issue.
Any chance for an armed skirmish between the two ships is low, analysts say, though the North Korean crew is possibly armed with rifles.
"It's still a cargo ship. A cargo ship can't confront a warship," said Baek Seung-joo of the Korea Institute for Defense Analyses.
Tension on the Korean peninsula has been running high since the North's May 25 nuclear test, with Pyongyang and Washington exchanging near-daily accusations against each other.
President Barack Obama assured Americans in an interview broadcast Monday that the U.S. is prepared for any move North Korea might make amid media reports that Pyongyang is planning a long-range missile test in early July.
"This administration — and our military — is fully prepared for any contingencies," Obama said during an interview with CBS News' "The Early Show."
Still, ever defiant, North Korea declared itself a "proud nuclear power" and warned Monday that it would strike if provoked.
"As long as our country has become a proud nuclear power, the U.S. should take a correct look at whom it is dealing with," the country's main Rodong Sinmun said in commentary. "It would be a grave mistake for the U.S. to think it can remain unhurt if it ignites the fuse of war on the Korean peninsula."
__
Associated Press writer Grant Peck in Bangkok and Jae-soon Chang in Seoul contributed to this report.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090622/ap_on_re_as/as_koreas_nuclear
Ron Paul 2012
I originally posted this in another thread, but I will add it here as it may turn out to be relevant to North Korea:
Saw this article that raises interesting possibilities:
Astronomers lose access to military data
Another thought I had... without this data, there would be fewer people able to contradict claims of a missile strike from North Korea. Or I may just be getting a little too conspiratorial.
Thoughts?
I had not put that into my mind mix yet.
Hmmmmm, that is very very ominous and fits completely in with what I think would be the best delivery method of a false flag against the West coast.
Too conspiratorial? Never, there is nothing wrong with stretching the imagination because you never know when you will stumble into something very big.
Another development in Korea:
U.S. Military Set to Intercept North Korean Ship Suspected of Proliferating Missiles, Nukes
and the question remains for now...does North Korea who has a maniacal leader who is dying and wants to secure his place in history and also provide some backbone to his burgeoning progeny who will assume the throne make good on it;s promise to set off a nuke if the ship is interdicted.
How interesting is it that the destroyer is named the USS John McCain...man when I first read that I thought it was a freaking joke.
I had the same reponse... I had to read it twice. Then I thought... you know, them guys behind the curtain at least have a sense of humour!
I read somewhere that last 4th of July N. Korea shot a missle off towards us.. it blew up in seconds.
I'm wondering about a flase-flag here....
~Live life to its fullest... with open arms, an open heart and most importantly, an open mind.~
nuking Hawaii would be one of the more sensible(lol?) choices for a false flag. Yes you would lose a valuable tourist and historical place but it's so far from the mainland that fallout risk would be negligible and with the open spot for a state available we could officially bring Israel in as the new 50th state. It would also be very valuable to use as the new new Pearl Harbor. The "left wing" version of 9/11 and the PNAC report.
Like I said below, how hard would it be to sneak the SSBN SuperArmageddonDoomsday666 into position off the coast of the DPRK and fire off a trident to make it look like a rogue launch. Yeah China and Russia would figure it out pretty quickly, but by that time we would already be committed to an open nuclear war.
If you read that other terrorist profiling thing the other day, Native Americans are on the list. What do you think Hawaii natives are?
So to them it's basically a domestic terrorist island anyways.
I like your thought on Israel doing the 50th state dance... and am kinda worried about data blockage, as Khomar brought up.
It would make an EPIC new-new Pearl Harbor, you are right.
I just hope it doesn't make too much sense for them...
~Live life to its fullest... with open arms, an open heart and most importantly, an open mind.~
A couple months ago Mike Rivero the owner of whatreallyhappened who lives in Hawaii, was running stories about how Hawaii had it's sovereignty stolen from them and that there was a growing movement to reclaim their right to exist as a seperate entity. Not really secession because in their minds they aren't a real state. They fit perfectly into the DHS vision for what a modern domestic terrorist organization looks like. Rivero was also running story after story about how the Navy was shooting up the outlying areas of the islands with DU. So a nuke blast in Hawaii would also have the side effect of silencing one of the largest alternative news aggregate sites on the internet.
(see above)
Aloha Hawaii?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1193941/North-Korea-pl...
ciao.
Not buying it since the North Koreans have, like so many other countries threatened by the U.S., said that they will retaliate against U.S. aggression. This of course is always taken as OMG THIS COUNTRY WANTS TO WIPE US ALL OFF THE MAP THESE SONS OF BITCHES MUST DIE. The best example being the Ahmadinejad always being misquoted when speaking about retaliation against a U.S. attack or when he says that Zionism needs to be wiped off the face of the Earth.
Anyway it doesn't freaking matter because the missile has notoriously bad guidance and has a max range 500 miles short of the supposed target.
Maybe,
but if they launch a Taepodong 3 instead of a Taepodong 2, then Hawaii is in their reach.
So is Los Angeles, Portland, and Anchorage.
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Korea/HF21Dg02.html
ciao.
Well you know if we want this bad enough the navy could just position a sub off the coast of NK and fire off a trident in the direction of Hawaii and nobody would ever know the difference. Well except for the Chinese and Russians who have sophisticated satellites that are built to locate and track missile launches but that should be no trouble for our media to spin.
Right.
I'm waiting to see what happens with this ship that Khomar linked the article to. This is going to be interesting to watch.
ciao.
I am definitely inclined to agree with you.
In Order to Practice Brinksmanship,
one must know when to step back:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/06/18/military-tracking-north-korea...
ciao.
E what is Brinksmanship?
i know ... my thoughts too.
i'm like ... holy crap... grade 10 flashback!!! i should have payed (paid??) attention in class better.
Here you go, Poodle
I read the entry before posting it--it is one of the good wikipedia entries.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brinksmanship
ciao.
Oooo that's a really great word, I wonder why it's not more common
Because it is hard
to fit it into a sentence when one is talking about Nascar or Dancing With the Stars.
ciao.
ya no kidding.
but it is a REALLY, REALLY great word!
The thing I find strange about North Korea is that there is hardly any news at all in the international websites. Check out the front pages of China's two biggest sites:
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/index.html
Nothing
http://www.chinaview.cn/index.htm
It just seems strange to me that China, their next door neighbor, doesn't have much in their news on the subject. I did a search for more North Korean articles, and all of the negative statements and press are coming from American sources.
It is so hard when the air is filled with so many lies and distortions -- who do you trust? Our government seems to be raising a big stink about North Korea (with the collusion of our media), but is there really a threat at all? Just as there was no threat from Iraq despite "everyone" saying so in 2002, I wonder if they are fabricating an enemy once again.
No conclusions yet, but I am skeptical.
Go South
South Korean news sources:
http://english.chosun.com/
http://www.koreaherald.co.kr/
http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/index.asp
or to Japan:
http://www.japantimes.co.jp/
http://www.asahi.com/english/
ciao.
Thanks for the links.
No problem, Khomar.
ciao.
Woo Hoo!
The latest and greatest news:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/17/AR200906...
Funny, I always thought that the U.S. empire was going to start to die in Afghanistan, not Korea.
ciao.
I'd like to know what they're thinking in China.
North Korea would be like the crazy uncle that nobody wants to talk about.
I think they are going to do
as little as possible, and try to avoid the nukes.
ciao.
Sounds like KJ-I has been playing a little too much Fallout3
and not enough Wii Fit.
(No subject)
snicker
ciao.
That's one of the strangest things I've ever read.
I also love how the socialist claims copyright protection.
How much is real and how much is bluff in the article???
If it's true, the North Koreans seem to have the US in "check mate".
That is the question
I seriously doubt that the DPRK is able to sustain the nuclear arsenal that is mentioned in the article. My fear is that instead of confronting Kim Jong Il with overwhelming force (see the Tree War), the Obama administration is going to pussyfoot around and get us involved in a real war.
I also think that those two "Japanese" that were detained in Italy with those bonds are North Korean intelligence and the bonds are forgeries.
http://www.asianews.it/index.php?l=en&art=15505&size=A
ciao.
I think I saw this one -- is Steven Seagal in it?
Nope. It was Chuck Norris.
ciao.
Good god. I misspelled Steven and now I can't edit it. Kat would love that.
***
Something definitely weird about the bond thing. We'll never be told the truth though. It's good that they've changed the selective service rules now so everyone can be drafted. My grandma's been itching to kick some commie ass.
Then you should buy her a ticket to D.C.
ciao.
She lives in Commiefornia.
All we'd need to do is unlock the wheels on her walker and Schwarzenegger would feel the full wrath and fury of Grandma Maxine.
It might take her a while to get to Sacramento though. She'd have to stop to watch "Young And The Restless" and then take a nap.